2046 Draft Discussion

Here you can Discuss Players, Picks, or anything Draft related
Post Reply
User avatar
WilleB
Posts: 3544
Joined: Thu Jan 09, 2014 1:04 pm
Location: Oklahoma City, OK
Contact:

2046 Draft Discussion

Post by WilleB »

Thoughts on the class, projections, selections etc...

Join us on Slack if you haven't already.
User avatar
nbryant
Posts: 154
Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2014 5:39 pm

Re: 2046 Draft Discussion

Post by nbryant »

Wille, any chance that you, or others you delegate, make the draft picks for the AI teams? The game picks may fill needs but usually suck and if those teams eventually get a GM they for sure would appreciate it.
“Some people spend an entire lifetime wondering if they made a difference in the world. But, the Marines don't have that problem.”
― Ronald Reagan
User avatar
WilleB
Posts: 3544
Joined: Thu Jan 09, 2014 1:04 pm
Location: Oklahoma City, OK
Contact:

Re: 2046 Draft Discussion

Post by WilleB »

nbryant wrote: Thu May 06, 2021 4:22 pm Wille, any chance that you, or others you delegate, make the draft picks for the AI teams? The game picks may fill needs but usually suck and if those teams eventually get a GM they for sure would appreciate it.
Will be monitoring 1st rd for sure. Baltimore will be getting that RB, like the mock. They have a stud QB. New weights J. David Baker put in makes the AI picks a little better.
User avatar
dthompso8
Posts: 361
Joined: Fri Jan 03, 2014 4:00 am

Re: 2046 Draft Discussion

Post by dthompso8 »

was shocked to see RB Cunningham available at 1.15 (I didn't interview him as thought there was no way he fell outside the top 5). Despite not taking a close look at him there was no way I could pass.

I was also really surprised to see WR Collier was still available, thought he was a top 10 pick at least! I think Oakland got themselves a good one with pick 1.20
Image
User avatar
WilleB
Posts: 3544
Joined: Thu Jan 09, 2014 1:04 pm
Location: Oklahoma City, OK
Contact:

Re: 2046 Draft Discussion

Post by WilleB »

dthompso8 wrote: Sat May 08, 2021 10:47 am was shocked to see RB Cunningham available at 1.15 (I didn't interview him as thought there was no way he fell outside the top 5). Despite not taking a close look at him there was no way I could pass.

I was also really surprised to see WR Collier was still available, thought he was a top 10 pick at least! I think Oakland got themselves a good one with pick 1.20
No clue why many passed on him. Great value at 15!
GM Since the ImageEra

APFL Champions - 2015, 2021, 2026, 2031
NFC Champions - 2015, 2021, 2026, 2027, 2031, 2032
NFC East Champions - 2017, 2018, 2019, 2021, 2023, 2024, 2025, 2026, 2027, 2028, 2031-41
User avatar
BazookaJohnny
Posts: 492
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 8:44 am

Re: 2046 Draft Discussion

Post by BazookaJohnny »

Wouldn't have minded grabbing Cunningham but we had a stud RB from last year.
Post Reply